Cube Reaction C:62 Racehardtail Review

There are many carbon hardtails available. However, the Cube Reaction is considered one of the most attractive options in the extensive range. Does this also apply to the new edition of the race hardtail, which will be available from 2025?

The difference to the Phenix top models is already noticeable in the size selection. While the Phenix comes in only 4 sizes, the Reaction C:62 is available in 6 sizes from XS to XXL. The smallest size XS rolls on small 27.5-inch wheels. Only from size S onwards are 29er tires used. Overall, the frame tends to be smaller than other models, thanks to the seat clamp integrated into the seat tube.

A longer head tube and a shorter main frame make the sitting position of the Reaction much more upright than the Phenix. With a 100 mm long stem (from size L), it goes against the trend of making the handling even more direct in cross country bikes. Stems with 70 mm or even less are now common even in the Cross Country World Cup.

Same look, same manufacturer. Naturally, the comparison between Cube Phenix and Reaction comes to mind. And we have made this comparison for you. But in most cases, this won’t be a real purchasing decision. Because the cheapest Phenix and the most expensive Reaction are separated by over 2000 €. However, with this comparison, you can nicely compare the differences in equipment and geometry one-to-one.

It’s more realistic to choose between the Cube Reaction and a bike from another manufacturer. Therefore, we’ve decided to list various carbon hardtails in the price range of around €3000. By clicking on the arrow icon , you can create a comparison and make your purchasing decision.

Also worth considering with the classic 100 mm concept are the Scott Scale and the Orbea Alma. The Merida Big Nine is also available for under €3000. However, more intriguing is the modern approach that Rose with the PDQ or Mondraker with the Chrono Carbon DC are taking. Both bikes come with 120 mm travel and a dropper post out of the box, giving them a significantly broader range of use. In a large system comparison, we’ve already examined the pros and cons of such a concept in detail and concluded that this approach is actually the better way.