Can it get better?

New Rock Shox Lyrik Review

RockShox is throwing a new Lyrik into the ring. This fork is so packed with new tech that we had to ask: does anyone actually need it? We didn’t settle for marketing hype—we tore the fork down and put it on the stiffness test rig against the Fox 36. Is the new Lyrik just an incremental update, or the new gold standard for e-MTBs and enduro rigs?

Youtube Video

Modern high-end suspension from Fox, RockShox, and other players is already operating at an extremely high level. If you’re riding a top-spec rig these days, you’ll rarely complain about poor small-bump sensitivity. That wasn’t always the case, but it’s the status quo now.

So the challenge for RockShox was: how do you improve a system that already works damn well? The answer isn’t a single “miracle feature,” but rather relentless optimization of friction and chassis stiffness.

RockShox Lyrik 2027 Review
The new Lyrik is loaded with features. We didn’t just put RockShox’s latest-gen fork to the test out on the trail.

The Stiffness Check: Hard Data from the Test Bench

What feels “precise” out on the trail has to be provable in the lab. Too many suspension and fork tests still end up being all about subjective feel. We wanted to know what’s really behind the catchphrases from the marketing decks, so we built our own test rig to measure stiffness.

To put the new Lyrik’s numbers into context, we also ran a current Fox 36 as well as the Rock Shox Zeb through the same protocol. That’s the only way to get data you can actually do something with in the end.

Fork stiffness
Here, we measure braking stiffness. To do this, the fork is clamped in our test rig and loaded at the axle with 20 kg. The deflection is measured using a dial indicator.
Messwert Fox 36 (MY 2026) RockShox Lyrik (MY 2027) RockShox ZEB (MY 2026)
Brake stiffness - 11% (softer) 100% (base) + 12% (stiffer)
Torsional stiffness - 13% (softer 100% (base) + 20% (stiffer)
Weight 2138 g (-125 g) 2263 g 2305 g (+42 g)
Stanchion diameter 36 mm 35 mm 38 mm
Travel 160 mm 160 mm 170 mm
Einbaulänge 570 mm 570 mm 585 mm

Although the Lyrik runs slimmer 35 mm stanchions than the Fox 36, it’s noticeably stiffer. Brake stiffness in particular is key: the less the fork flexes back under hard braking, the less the bushings bind internally. The result is more sensitive small-bump compliance when things get rowdy.

When it comes to torsional stiffness, opinions differ. Our take: for pinpoint steering, a stiff fork is simply better. And you’re still not in that “too harshly stiff” territory.

The price of stiffness: the Lyrik weighs about 125 g more than the Fox 36. That’s not something you can ignore, but on the overall weights of all-mountain and enduro bikes, it’s still a reasonable trade-off.

Fork stiffness
To test torsional stiffness, the fork is clamped at the axle interface and a 20 kg weight is hung off a dummy handlebar. Deflection is measured on the opposite side.
Fork stiffness
Anyone who’s seen how much the fork moves under just a 20 kg load can imagine that this flex is enough to deliver a smooth ride feel.
Fork stiffness
The fork always delivers a controlled feel on the trail, with no surprises.
RockShox Lyrik Weight
The new Lyrik has put on a bit of weight compared to its predecessor.

The internals: Four new tech features

We tore the fork down completely to get a handle on the “software” (the internals). This is where the real innovations are hiding:

1. Wagon Technology – Lubrication 2.0

RockShox uses small dimples in the stanchion tubes. As the fork compresses, they actively move oil upward to the bushings.

The effect: A consistent oil film reduces friction and—more importantly—wear. This massively extends service intervals. It’s the technical answer to Fox’s oil channels, just achieved through a different design approach.

Butter Wagon Technology
The Butter Wagon tech only really comes to light once you pull the casting off the stanchion tubes.
Butter Wagon Technology
Below the dust wipers, the fork has small dimples in the stanchion surface.

2. Sealed air chamber (friction reduction)

Just like on the dual-crown BoXXer, the air piston now runs in its own sealed unit inside the stanchion.

Why that’s smart: The piston has a smaller diameter. Less diameter means less seal contact area and therefore lower breakaway force (stiction). RockShox is knocking out the last inherent sources of drag here—especially since the fork runs at noticeably higher air pressure, making friction a smaller factor (percentage-wise) as the fork compresses.

RockShox Lyrik air spring
The air spring piston no longer runs directly in the stanchion tube, but instead in a sealed air chamber.
RockShox Lyrik air spring
The air chamber can still be reduced with tokens.

3. ABO – Adjustable Bottom-Out

Instead of manipulating the entire spring curve with air-volume tokens, the ABO system delivers a tunable mechanical bottom-out stop. Using an Allen key, you can dial in how much the fork ramps up in the last few millimeters to keep hard hits from blowing through the travel. That makes setup a lot more intuitive and straightforward.

Tire Insert Subscription
At the bottom end of the air can sits the rubber bumper, mechanically preventing harsh bottom-outs.
Tire Insert Subscription
This Abo rim insert can be adjusted in its position from the outside.
RockShox Lyrik Experience
With the new Lyrik, we couldn’t provoke any harsh bottom-outs anymore—even in the roughest terrain.

4. Linear XL & Venting

The air volume in the casting has been increased to minimize unwanted compression as the fork cycles through its travel. Plus, the bleed valves (pressure equalization) are now conveniently placed in the fork crown for easy access.

Linear XL air spring
The most visually striking change: the Linear XL airbox. Behind it is simply a single air volume.
Bleeding
The bleed port for the casting has moved up into the fork crown. The effect, however, is the same as on the previous model.

Charger 3.2 damping: Control through composure

Because the whole system (casting and air spring) is now running ultra–low friction, RockShox was able to dial in a firmer damping tune (Charger 3.2). The fork delivers more support and control without feeling harsh or dead.

Especially user-friendly: the setup has been simplified. There are fewer clicks than you might be used to from, say, Fox, a clearly marked middle position, and no overly complicated high- and low-speed rebound adjusters.

The adjustment range sits right where it matters. The clicks are noticeable—especially when you roll two clicks at a time—but you also can’t totally mis-dial the fork. RockShox picked the upper and lower limits smartly to reduce the risk of a bad setup.

Charger 3.2 cartridge
Fewer clicks, clearly indexed mid positions, and noticeably more damping. The Charger 3.2 cartridge is all about easy setup and user-friendly tuning.
RockShox Suspension Review
On the trail, the fork feels noticeably more damped than other models, which delivers a super controlled ride feel.

Prices and Technologies

MSRP prices for suspension forks are usually of limited value, since the fork you’re talking about most often comes spec’d on a complete bike anyway or doesn’t actually go over the counter at MSRP. Still, we’re listing the fork’s MSRP here as a point of reference.

More important than the MSRP of the top-tier fork for most riders is which technologies can also be found on the more affordable forks. The full-on feature fireworks are truly only available on the Ultimate fork. The cheaper versions make some pretty clear compromises for now:

Lyrik Flight Attendant Lyrik Ultimate Lyrik Select+ Lyrik Select Lyrik (without add-on)
MSRP 1855 € 1375 € Not available in the aftermarket. 1015 € Not available in the aftermarket.
Butter Wagon Technology X X
Charger 3.2 damper X X X
SUB (rim impact protection) X X X
Linear XL X X X X

None of the technologies or individual components can be retrofitted to older forks. On top of that, RockShox is also running new dust wipers and a new (thicker) fork oil for the new generation of forks to cut stiction and bring friction down.

The fork steals the spotlight, but the RockShox Super Deluxe shock has also gotten an update.

Super Deluxe shock gets an update

The fork usually steals the spotlight when it comes to suspension, but Rock Shox has also been dialing in the rear end. The Rock Shox Super deluxe shock is getting an update as well—though it’s not quite as extensive as what the fork received.

The air can has been enlarged, also under the Linear XL banner. The HBO (hydraulic bottom out) feature to protect against harsh bottom-outs remains on the shock.

Overall, just like with the fork, the goal is to differentiate from main competitor Fox with a significantly lighter, more straightforward setup (fewer adjusters, smaller adjustment ranges, clearly marked dial positions, sag indicator on the stanchion).

RockShox Super Deluxe Review
A perfect MTB suspension setup comes from the harmony between the fork, rear end, and shock.

We rode the Super Deluxe shock together with the new Lyrik fork on an Orbea Occam LT and can confirm the features are beyond reproach. The shock nails the balance between lightweight construction and trail performance with ease.

That said, everyone should be aware: retrofitting a shock isn’t exactly plug-and-play. Because even if you order it in the correct eye-to-eye length and with the right stroke, many brands spec a custom “tune” on the OEM shock that you don’t always get in the aftermarket. In some cases, a higher-end shock can simply match a rear suspension kinematic worse than a lower-end unit that came stock.

RockShox Super Deluxe Review

Conclusion: The sum of the details

The new RockShox Lyrik isn’t a quantum leap that leaves the competition unrideable. But it’s the result of seriously deep, detail-driven development work. With that, RockShox nudges a bit ahead of Fox. The Lyrik rides insanely well, is stiffer, and—most importantly—is easier to dial in. It’s not a marketing gimmick, but a fork that effectively solves issues like short service intervals and overly complicated setups.

About the author

Ludwig Döhl

... has spent more than 100,000 kilometers in the saddle of over 1000 different mountain bikes. The essence of many hours on the trail: Mountain bikes are awesome when they match your personal preferences! With this realization, he founded bike-test.com to assist cyclists in finding their very own dream bike.

Recommended for you

Scott Aspect 920 im Test

Scott Aspect 920 review – How much mountain bike do you get for 1000 €? The Scott...

Radon Jealous AL 10.0 Review

The Radon Jealous AL 10.0 featured in this review has one clear objective: to deliver m...

Mondraker Chrono Carbon DC New Release

Affordable, 120mm of travel, and pre-fitted with a dropper post. The new Mondraker Chro...

Do you even still buy a MTB without a motor?

Should I buy an EMTB or a normal mountain bike? Mountain bikes with motors have not onl...